The core Internet institutions abandon the US Government | IGP Blog

Standard

http://www.internetgovernance.org/2013/10/11/the-core-internet-institutions-abandon-the-us-government/

IGP Blog
HOME
ABOUT
PEOPLE
EVENTS
PUBLICATIONS
PRESS
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
ARCHIVES
OCTOBER 11, 2013
THE CORE INTERNET INSTITUTIONS ABANDON THE US GOVERNMENT
In Montevideo, Uruguay this week, the Directors of all the major Internet organizations – ICANN, the Internet Engineering Task Force, the Internet Architecture Board, the World Wide Web Consortium, the Internet Society, all five of the regional Internet address registries – turned their back on the US government. With striking unanimity, the organizations that actually develop and administer Internet standards and resources initiated a break with 3 decades of U.S. dominance of Internet governance.

A statement released by this group called for “accelerating the globalization of ICANN and IANA functions, towards an environment in which all stakeholders, including all governments, participate on an equal footing.” That part of the statement constituted an explicit rejection of the US Commerce Department’s unilateral oversight of ICANN through the IANA contract. It also indirectly attacks the US unilateral approach to the Affirmation of Commitments, the pact between the US and ICANN which provides for periodic reviews of its activities by the GAC and other members of the ICANN community. (The Affirmation was conceived as an agreement between ICANN and the US exclusively – it would not have been difficult to allow other states to sign on as well.)

Underscoring the global significance and the determination of the group to have a global impact, the Montevideo statement was released in English, Spanish, French, Arabic, Russian and Chinese. In conversations with some of the participants of the Montevideo meeting, it became clear that they were thinking of new forms of multistakeholder oversight as a substitute for US oversight, although no detailed blueprint exists.

But that was only the beginning. A day after the Montevideo declaration, the President and CEO of ICANN, Fadi Chehadi – the man vetted by the US government to lead its keystone Internet governance institution – met with Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff. And at this meeting, Chehade engaged in some audacious private Internet diplomacy. He asked “the president [of Brazil] to elevate her leadership to a new level, to ensure that we can all get together around a new model of governance in which all are equal.” A press release from the Brazilian government said that President Rousseff wanted the event to be held in April 2014 in Rio de Janeiro. The President of ICANN thus not only allied himself with a political figure who has been intensely critical of the US government and the NSA spying program, he conspired with her to convene a global meeting to begin forging a new system of Internet governance that would move beyond the old world of US hegemony.

Make no mistake about it: this is important. It is the latest, and one of the most significant manifestations of the fallout from the Snowden revelations about NSA spying on the global Internet. It’s one thing when the government of Brazil, a longtime antagonist regarding the US role in Internet governance, gets indignant and makes threats because of the revelations. And of course, the gloating of representatives of the International Telecommunication Union could be expected. But this is different. Brazil’s state is now allied with the spokespersons for all of the organically evolved Internet institutions, the representatives of the very “multi-stakeholder model” the US purports to defend. You know you’ve made a big mistake, a life-changing mistake, when even your own children abandon you en masse.

Here at the Internet Governance Project we take only a grim satisfaction in this latest turn of events. We have been urging the USG to end its privileged role and complete the privatization of the DNS management for nearly ten years. The proper substitute for unilateral Commerce Department oversight, we argued, was not multilateral “political oversight” but an international agreement articulating clear rules regarding what ICANN can and cannot do, an agreement that explicitly protects freedom of expression and other individual rights and liberal Internet governance principles. We have heard every argument imaginable about why this did not have to happen: no one really cared about the governance of the DNS root; there was no better alternative; the rest of the world secretly wanted the US to do this; etc., etc. A combination of arrogance, complacency and domestic political pressure prevented any action.

Had that advice been heeded, had the US sought to divest itself of its unilateral oversight on its own initiative, it could have exercised some control over the transition and advanced its cherished values of freedom and democracy. It could have ensured, for example, that an independent ICANN was subject to clear limits on its authority and to new forms of accountability, which it badly needs. Now the U.S. has lost the initiative, irretrievably. The future evolution of Internet name and number governance, at the very least, is no longer up to them.

 
inShare
85
Written by Milton Mueller Posted in Uncategorized
64 COMMENTS

OCTOBER 11, 2013 – 06:58
Pingback: tandaabiashara | Have the core Internet institutions abandoned the US Government Post Snowden?
OCTOBER 11, 2013 – 09:24
Pingback: The core Internet institutions abandon the US Government | Rocketboom
OCTOBER 11, 2013 – 09:26
Pingback: The core Internet institutions abandon the US Government | Enjoying The Moment
OCTOBER 11, 2013 – 10:05
Pingback: The Day The Internet Abandoned The US Government

OCTOBER 11, 2013 – 12:07
Techno.C@T
Milton Mueller is RIDING in the ARIN BUS on the above trip. Did the ARIN CEO inform you about his actions? Did you have a chance to get off that bus? Has Milton Mueller TURNED HIS BACK on the US ?
[Note: Unlike some people, Mueller can not be deported from the USA]

Who will be FLYING on the IANA Planes to the South Pacific Resorts in two weeks ? FIJI ? Somoa ? BALI ?

Who will remain in the USA working on the NTIA FirstNET ?

Reply
OCTOBER 11, 2013 – 12:28
Pingback: The core Internet institutions abandon the US G…

OCTOBER 11, 2013 – 13:42
Ben
I used to think ICANN should stay with the US because the US had proven they wouldn’t interfere and such.

I was dead wrong. Get the internet out of any government’s reach!

Reply
OCTOBER 11, 2013 – 13:59
Pingback: ICANN, W3C Call For End Of US Internet Ascendancy Following NSA Revelations | Blogburger
OCTOBER 11, 2013 – 15:37
Pingback: ICANN, W3C, Internet Society y más rompen con EE.UU. y se alían a Brasil | mundoTEKNO
OCTOBER 11, 2013 – 15:58
Pingback: ICANN, W3C, Internet Society y más rompen con EE.UU. y se alían a Brasil – Tech-News
OCTOBER 11, 2013 – 16:03
Pingback: Marketing Day: October 11, 2013
OCTOBER 11, 2013 – 18:09
Pingback: Global Internet Bodies Turn Their Backs on US Oversight – Arik Hesseldahl – News – AllThingsD

OCTOBER 11, 2013 – 18:58
Jim Mooney
It is apparent that Obama is willing to offend any nation or organization, pursue all whistleblowers until they are dead, and give up anything, in order to defend the NSA. (And the banksters). That is sad. And I’m a Democrat.

Reply

OCTOBER 11, 2013 – 20:11
Paul
“And I’m a democrat”

Still? Wow.

Reply

OCTOBER 12, 2013 – 00:12
Julian
Like there’s a choice? I love how republicans conveniently forget that the patriot act, warrant less spying, etc was all pushed through by the Bush Administration.

And until we’ve broken the two party stranglehold, we’ll remain with only the choice between failed good intentions, or outright avarice and narcissism.

Reply

OCTOBER 13, 2013 – 10:00
FrogE
Choosing the lesser of 2 evils is still evil. We could try an anarcho capitalist approach, which champions free choice and criticises coercion. Coercion is the backbone of evil and government is the monolith in societsl coercion.

Reply

OCTOBER 13, 2013 – 10:05
Monty
Thumbs up! Well-stated, Julian!

Reply

OCTOBER 12, 2013 – 10:42
Nargg
…as if a Republican would not have done the 100% same exact thing. Did you also know “gullible” is not in the dictionary??

Reply

OCTOBER 12, 2013 – 19:01
Anon
You’ve gotta wonder what the secret services have got on him?

Reply

OCTOBER 12, 2013 – 22:16
Seth
You shouldn’t assume that Paul is a Republican. Maybe he’s an Independent. Better yet he could be a Libertarian. Better still an anarchist.

Reply

OCTOBER 13, 2013 – 05:02
Michael
Which is doubtlessly why he votes lockstep with the rest of the Republicans. You keep floating in your Paul cloud, friend.

Reply
OCTOBER 11, 2013 – 21:06
Pingback: 【PW晨报】Google、Facebook均有重要协议更新;索尼暂时放弃中国、美国市场
OCTOBER 11, 2013 – 21:48
Pingback: ICANN, W3C Call For End Of US Internet Ascendancy Following NSA Revelations | antonynzd376
OCTOBER 11, 2013 – 21:54
Pingback: Adiós Estadios Unidos: Las principales compañías reguladoras de Internet rompen con EUA | Conéctica

OCTOBER 11, 2013 – 21:57
Disco
Doesn’t matter Democrat or Rep. Both are no good. How about listening to common sense? Right is right, wrong is wrong. Divide and conquer is what the gov’t has done to its people.

Reply

OCTOBER 12, 2013 – 09:02
p1z4T
GREAT POST. Who cares who you elect it’s about making sound choices for the people you were elected to represent, period.

Reply

OCTOBER 12, 2013 – 10:43
Nargg
You seem to forget it’s the people’s fault. This is a government of the people. Last major election to Congress we all elected pissed off hardliners, and now we get what we paid for…

Reply

OCTOBER 12, 2013 – 13:30
Jay
Really… You think it is that much of a people’s government?

Reply
OCTOBER 11, 2013 – 22:33
Pingback: The core Internet institutions abandon the US Government | The Freedom Watch
OCTOBER 11, 2013 – 23:34
Pingback: Global Internet Bodies Turn Their Backs on U.S. Oversight – Advanced Computer Learning Company

OCTOBER 11, 2013 – 23:52
Fox
@Disco
And Divided we all are. A sad truth

Reply

OCTOBER 12, 2013 – 01:40
Tracy Roberts
When you guys in the US all realise that all but 2 of the Presidents are all cousins, and cousins to the Queen of England you will eventually get that it is a rigged game. The US social security scheme is owned by the Queen, not the British government, her majesty herself. As I said, a rigged game

Reply

OCTOBER 12, 2013 – 10:44
Nargg
LOL, you really need to get a clue. We all started from Adam and Eve so in a sense we are ALL cousins.

Reply

OCTOBER 12, 2013 – 11:21
Benjamin Foot
[Citation Needed]

Reply

OCTOBER 12, 2013 – 04:30
Terrence Koeman
And what will change exacty? We get more parties that can create tlds?

Surely the US still claims ownership over .com .net .org and .edu, and will still own 30% to 40% of the IPv4 space.

Also, I don’t see any impact on the NSA spying if ICANN and IANA are no longer under US control. The NSA taps directly the fibers around the country at US backbones that are obligated to comply. How is that going to change?

Fine, you say it is important. So please elaborate how this will affect different kinds of people and organizations and in what way. Now it reads like a ‘I told you so!’ piece, with a lot of ‘It’s BIG!’, without actually informing us about anthing but that a change is afoot.

Personally (and I have dealth with a lot of RIRs and Registries) I really wouldn’t like a UN-style governing body with their board and meetings and non-binding resolutions, with the VS (and perhaps some others) with veto rights to boot. Either nothing will ever get done anymore or they will fuck up the internet.

The US invested lots of money in the internet, I don’t see a problem with them holding on onto some control of it.

If Brazil wants to have a say over the internet, how about they take the internet seriously first and clean up their part of the internet? It is freaking impossible to get any help with cybercrime there (seemingly no laws on tje subject there) and their universities are so poorly secured that half of them participate in denial of service attacks, or are otherwise compromised.

Yes, sure, let them get their hands on the rest of the internet, that’ll work out just fine. Not even mentioning China.

A shared system will end up being a compromise all around, and seeing as what countries are dying to meddle in it globally it probably won’t end up a positive change for the west.

Reply

OCTOBER 13, 2013 – 02:21
Catherine Fitzpatrick
Yes, you’re making a lot of sense.

Reply
OCTOBER 12, 2013 – 05:48
Pingback: ICANN, W3C Call For End Of US Internet Ascendancy Following NSA Revelations
OCTOBER 12, 2013 – 05:55
Pingback: Global Internet Bodies Turn Their Backs on U.S. Oversight
OCTOBER 12, 2013 – 07:17
Pingback: Milton Mueller: The core Internet institutions abandon the US Government | Governing the Net
OCTOBER 12, 2013 – 08:28
Pingback: 2013/10/12 Weekly Tech Headlines | 404 Tech Support
OCTOBER 12, 2013 – 09:02
Pingback: ICANN, W3C, Internet Society y más rompen con EE.UU. y se alían a Brasil | Honduras Post
OCTOBER 12, 2013 – 09:27
Pingback: The End of US Internet Governance | Java, SQL and jOOQ.
OCTOBER 12, 2013 – 09:59
Pingback: ICANN, W3C, Internet Society y más rompen con EE.UU. y se alían a Brasil | JIVANDERHORST
OCTOBER 12, 2013 – 11:20
Pingback: The core Internet institutions abandon the U.S. government
OCTOBER 12, 2013 – 12:02
Pingback: Marketing Day: October 11, 2013 | jhWebWorks | Columbus Ohio Web Design, Development, SEO, Social Media
OCTOBER 12, 2013 – 13:06
Pingback: ICANN, W3C, Internet Society y más rompen con EE.UU. y se alían a Brasil | Creatyum Graphics
OCTOBER 12, 2013 – 13:47
Pingback: The Core Internet Institutions Abandon the US Government | Dewayne-Net Archives
OCTOBER 12, 2013 – 14:04
Pingback: Core Internet Institutions have Rejected the U.S. Dominance | Transmedia Newswire

OCTOBER 12, 2013 – 14:47
Craig Simon
For some background on the historical origins of ICANN and Internet Governance in general, have a look at http://www.scribd.com/doc/58805571/Launching-the-DNS-War-Dot-Com-Privatization-and-the-Rise-of-Global-Internet-Governance

Reply
OCTOBER 12, 2013 – 16:00
Pingback: Tu Tecnología | Los arquitectos de internet quieren independizarse de la supervisión de EEUU
OCTOBER 12, 2013 – 18:44
Pingback: Major Internet Organizations Break Free Of US Government’s Oversight
OCTOBER 12, 2013 – 19:00
Pingback: The US is Losing Control of the Internet…Oh, Really?

OCTOBER 12, 2013 – 19:19
delia ruhe
Well, it’s a start.

Reply

OCTOBER 13, 2013 – 02:20
Catherine Fitzpatrick
“Conspired” is exactly the word to use here.

And these non-governmental agencies that you claim were in the pocket of the US never really were under US control but under control of factions anyway. Would that they *were* under control so they could have some hope of remaining liberal and democratic and transparent. indeed, given that the major Big IT companies are US based, like Google, it would make sense.

But no, you anarchists had to push for the fake “multi-stakeholder” model which is utter baloney because only some holders get to stake, the rest are fictions.

And you’ll see how this lovely third-world veneer of the lovely Brazilian president is just a cover for Russian and/or Chinese takeover. Enjoy.

Reply

OCTOBER 13, 2013 – 08:34
Gabriel Dread
I’m Brazilian and I never heard of any foreign influence over Brazilian government except from US. Can you clarify what do you mean about your claim that we have bonds with Russia and China?

Do you know that your beloved US sponsored a Military Coup in Brazil and was co-responsible for the death and torture of thousands of innocent people during a 20 year dictatorship that ruined our country?

You Americans think you are better that the rest of the world. You support your fascist State and want to own the whole planet, think your laws apply to us and think you deserve more and better because you have an economic system that you imposed to the rest of the world.

How can you sleep with the blood of só many millions of lives in your hands?

Reply
OCTOBER 13, 2013 – 03:37
Pingback: Hva hendte på veien til Damaskus? | Steigan blogger
OCTOBER 13, 2013 – 03:56
Pingback: ICANN, W3C Call For End Of US Internet Ascendancy Following NSA Revelations | fapilokut
OCTOBER 13, 2013 – 05:52
Pingback: USA verliert Kontrolle über das Internet | 11k2
OCTOBER 13, 2013 – 06:31
Pingback: more surveillance internet network | venusdreams
OCTOBER 13, 2013 – 08:42
Pingback: The core Internet institutions abandon the US Government | IGP Blog
OCTOBER 13, 2013 – 08:48
Pingback: Internet vänder USA ryggen — Flickus flackus flum
OCTOBER 13, 2013 – 10:42
Pingback: [links] Link salad mumbles something about Sunday | jlake.com
OCTOBER 13, 2013 – 10:51
Pingback: The core Internet institutions abandon the US Government | IGP Blog

OCTOBER 13, 2013 – 12:09
Len Bullard
The interesting question is not about the US particular political parties or their roles in the events leading to these decision but if ICANN has the muscle to speak truth to the Canadian who spied on Brazil, the Russians who spy on the Chinese and the Chinese who spy on everyone? IOW, however good this makes particulars feel at this time, it is unlikely ICANN or and Internet standards group which purports to be free of political influence is given the status of volunteers who must do the heavy lifting and the finances of these institutions.

Be careful of what you wish for. As for the US, it is past time for US interests to begin to work on taking high value information Off The Web per se and work harder on internal information systems shared securely by policy and contract. One does not leave gold in the front yard with a sign saying “Take what you need and need only what you take.”

In shorter words: the web was designed by social morons and implemented by children. It’s time for adults to work out a better plan.

Reply
POST A COMMENT
Name (required)

Email (required – will be kept a secret)

Website

Comment

You may use the following HTML:









Keep your pants on: Governments want suspenders for secure routing










What we are reading:

Opening Standards: The Global Politics of Interoperability (The Information Society Series)Opening Standards: The Global Politics of Interoperability (The Information Society Series) by Laura DeNardis

Consent of the Networked: The Worldwide Struggle For Internet FreedomConsent of the Networked: The Worldwide Struggle For Internet Freedom by Rebecca MacKinnon

Institutional Foundations of Impersonal Exchange: Theory and Policy of Contractual RegistriesInstitutional Foundations of Impersonal Exchange: Theory and Policy of Contractual Registries by Benito Arrunada

Black Code: Inside the Battle for CyberspaceBlack Code: Inside the Battle for Cyberspace by Ronald J. Deibert

Defending an Open, Global, Secure, and Resilient InternetDefending an Open, Global, Secure, and Resilient Internet by John D. Negroponte

Research Handbook on Governance of the InternetResearch Handbook on Governance of the Internet by Ian Brown

Powered by LibraryThing

RECENT POSTS

The core Internet institutions abandon the US Government

Keep your pants on: Governments want suspenders for secure routing

Meltdown IV: How ICANN resists accountability

Meltdown III: How top-down ‘implementation’ replaced bottom-up policymaking

The day the world agreed with IGP?

RECENT COMMENTS

Len Bullard on The core Internet institutions abandon the US Government

The core Internet institutions abandon the US Government | IGP Blog on The core Internet institutions abandon the US Government

[links] Link salad mumbles something about Sunday | jlake.com on The core Internet institutions abandon the US Government

Monty on The core Internet institutions abandon the US Government

FrogE on The core Internet institutions abandon the US Government

82188 visits

since 12 Sep 2013

FOLLOW IGP ON WEIBO









CONTACT

Internet Governance Project

iSchool @ Syracuse University

Syracuse, NY USA 13244

p: +1.315.443.5616

e: info@internetgovernance.org









META

Register

Log in

Entries RSS

Comments RSS

WordPress.org















462 total views, no views today